Transparency in Credit Management; Risk Management at RateSetter

This is a guest post by Kevin Allen, Head of Insight at RateSetter.

Credit management and consumer trust: the words are inexplicably linked for the majority of financial services providers, particularly those dealing with personal finance. In fact the approximate to translation of the Latin “Creditum” meaning a loan is to the French “crédit” meaning trust. There is little doubt that consumers are increasingly alive to the mechanics of how institutions are looking after their hard-earned money – something that has stemmed from the global financial crisis when banks were guilty of lending household savings to all sorts of risky endeavours, with well documented results.

There is no clearer example of the importance of credit management than within the peer-to-peer lending industry. In the absence of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, the biggest single risk to lenders is that borrower defaults reach a level so severe that it absorbs not only the interest they might earn but their capital as well. RateSetter were the first peer-to-peer company globally to introduce the concept of a provision fund that provides lenders with an added level of control against loss of even the expected interest amount.

The provision fund has proved very successful, not only in providing lender confidence, but also in terms of its track record. We also aim to gain depth and breadth to our lending portfolio through an evolution of our offering. This will always include our core consumer lending offering for customers to buy cars, make home improvements and consolidate expensive credit card debt, but will include property development and commercial business lending to support the UKs SMEs.

RateSetter aims to continue this growth to provide more confidence to prospective and existing lenders and to ensure we can maintain our “every lender, every penny” through all economic cycles. Although as we always say, we cannot guarantee anything. And our lenders will also be diversified to include individuals, charities, institutions and businesses. The breakdown currently shows us as potentially the only P2P lender in the UK whose recent lending is dominated by individuals;

Ratesetter loanbook

So, although a peer-to-peer lender can rely on us to manage the Provision Fund, this leads us to the natural questions: who exactly am I lending my money to? And, how much are they contributing to the fund? So everything we say and do is built around careful and cautious credit assessment and any potential impact on the provision fund. But, equally important to the mechanics, is the transparency for our users. While banks and building societies still, even today, maintain an impenetrable barrier for users trying to understand what is happening to their money, we have gone to the opposite end of the spectrum, making openness part of our DNA. Continue reading

How I Selected My Preferred P2P Lending Marketplaces – Part II

This is part II of a guest post by British investor ‘Pete’. Read part I first.

The number P2P / P2B platforms in the UK has increased quite quickly over the past few years and I have currently settled on 3 further UK platforms that suit my needs and I strongly believe will be with us long term. In saying this I am not in possession of any privileged information and I am not by inference making any adverse comment about other platforms.

In alphabetical order

Ablrate

One of the new platforms (launched July 2014) that I have chosen to invest in and so far I have had a very positive experience. Specialising in secured Aircraft leasing and Plant and Machinery I have had the chance to diversify into a market that I knew little about before I started on my ‘due diligence’. The market may be new to me but there is a wealth of responsive experience behind Ablrate and coupled with a website update and promised increasing flow of loans I anticipate that my exposure with Ablrate will continue to grow. One interesting ‘innovation’ available on certain loans is ‘Instant Returns’. With long draw down times on some loans the potential for ‘dead money’ is large, instant returns circumvents this issue.

Assetz Capital

I have been investing with Assetz Capital since the second quarter of 2013 and have built up a diversified £ five digit portfolio of secured loans which continues to grow1. As with Ablrate there is a good, responsive and experienced team behind the web site, something that has become more than apparent when dealing with the occasional distressed loans that we must all expect when investing. Assetz Capital have big plans for expansion (they have already grown considerably since I started investing) and a relatively recent change to the way loan parts are bought has removed a very large percentage of the ‘dead money’ scenario that many of us early adopters experienced, not universally liked, I for one view it as a very positive move that has helped to push up my return on investment. I look forward to new opportunities this year.

1 I do not invest by choice in the provision fund protected ‘Green Energy Income Account’ preferring to take on the risk in return for a slightly higher returns.

Wellesley & Co

Again I was one of the early adopters and took advantage of some very attractive introductory rates that were offered. The loan and repayment terms suited my needs perfectly for tax planning purposes. Since then the rates have unsurprisingly been lowered and whilst Wellesley & Co have expanded rapidly and their range of investments on offer has expanded I find myself already invested in those areas with other platforms so I am running full term with my current investments whilst keeping an eye open on what is on offer.

Bondora

I also invest in one non UK platform, Bondora. This would probably be regarded as the ‘odd one out’ in my list of platforms. Far more volatile than the other platforms that I invest in Bondora has expanded rapidly since I started investing in the second quarter of 2013. I have experienced several changes to the platform, some which I have liked and several that I have not. I have experienced new markets being opened up and some eye watering rates of default in these new markets. That said and in spite of the treatment of defaults by the UK tax man and the strengthening of the Pound against the Euro (@16% since I started investing) my return after tax has remained positive. I spend more time on this relatively small percentage of my total investments to keep the returns positive than I do on any of the others. Continue reading

How I Selected My Preferred P2P Lending Marketplaces – Part I

This is part I of a guest post by British investor ‘Pete’.

Perhaps an introduction is the best way of starting this blog post since it should explain my reasons and approach to Peer to Peer (P2P) and Peer to Business (P2B) lending.

I am a UK based independent professional engineer. An engineer in my discipline requires a love of detail, data and spreadsheets and being independent it is required that I run my own company so I understand basic accounting and number/data manipulation.

So why do I invest in P2P and P2B? In the past I have had Pension funds raided, Investment funds loosing capital due to stock market losses and fees, a mortgage endowment policy returning 1.9% over 25 years when a simple cash investment returned +9%, shares devalued by the UK government who then bought them out at the devalued rate … a long list of ‘professionally’ managed schemes that lost my money. With P2P and P2B I am in control, I either sink or swim based on my decisions.

I started lending at the start of 2012 with Zopa and to a lesser degree with Ratesetter but not before I had read as much as I could find regarding P2P and the various business models. Using on-line resources research into Company and Directors ‘histories’ followed, a process I continue to use before I start investing with a new platform. Risk and Taxation were the next topics I looked into.

Whilst projected default rates were available on  Zopa I took a pessimistic view and anticipated a higher rate of loss when I put together my first spreadsheet to log my transactions and real rate of return (I mainly use Excel with the XIRR function). My aim with Zopa was to diversify as quickly as possible so I quickly put together a large number of small loans whilst ensuring that I didn’t have ‘dead money’ waiting to be lent out. This strategy worked and my losses have so far turned out to be below the Zopa projected level. In recent years Zopa have changed the way monies are lent out and introduced a provision fund to cover bad debts (Ratesetter have always had a fund) and at the same time investors rates dropped (Zopa dictated the rate at which money was lent) so I decided with regret that Zopa was no longer for me and started to withdraw monies as they became available, a process that will continue for some years since I am still happy with the return from my remaining loans.

In the meantime my Ratesetter account quietly built up (the power of compounding interest) and I had started investing in Funding Circle (Sept 2012). I quickly found out that due diligence was required when investing in listed loans (I do not like automatic bidders, I will always manually invest/re-invest) and whilst time consuming it gives some reassurance that you are not investing blind. Whilst the returns I received (and still receive) from Funding Circle are above those I receive from Zopa and Ratesetter I have found the time taken checking companies can be disproportionate to the return if small loans are made. In spite of due diligence the defaults in my experience are higher and coupled with the current UK taxation system for individuals, defaults can hit your rate of return in a disproportionate way.*

It is for these reasons that I have in the last year started withdrawing cash from Funding Circle in the same manner I am taking with Zopa. In the meantime my Ratesetter account continued to build. Continue reading

P2P Lending Experiences of a British Expat Living in the Eurozone

This is a guest post by British investor ‘JamesFrance‘.

Since retiring and leaving the UK to live in a warmer dryer part of Europe, I fortunately found myself able to live on less than my income, so had the problem of how to best manage these savings, which I wanted to protect from inflation and if possible achieve a positive return on by some type of short term investment. Unfortunately I never found a British savings account which would accept money from non residents, so I was obliged to accept a very low interest rate from my existing UK bank. I do have other long term investments so was prepared to take some risk to achieve a better return.

I had seen articles in the British press about Peer to Peer lending, which tended to refer to the big three, Zopa, Ratesetter and Funding Circle, none of which were prepared to allow a non resident to open an account, so I soon forgot about that as a possibility.   In August 2013 I read that another P2P business lending platform, Thincats, was joining the P2P finance association. I decided to look at their website and was surprised to learn that they could accept non resident investors.

Thincats is really for those with larger amounts to invest, having a minimum bid of 1000 GBP per loan, so it is difficult to achieve adequate diversification for relatively small sums without using their syndicates, which I didn’t find interesting, so I took the plunge and made 10 loans.   Needing 1000 GBP per loan meant that after that it took me some time to accumulate enough for my next bid, so I had the problem of uninvested money not earning until my next loan drew down.   I also found that some loans were repaid early which was reducing my returns because of the drawdown delays.   I think this would be an ideal platform for those with large amounts to invest, as they have a good flow of loans, there is plenty of information about the borrowing companies and once their new website is launched the process should be much easier.   A minimum 25 GBP fee for selling a loan on the secondary market makes it expensive to sell smaller amounts, which means that after several repayments a sale would not be economic.

By this time I was finding other possibilities with the help of websites such as P2P-Banking.com, where I read about isePankur in Estonia, which has an English language version and seemed ideal for any spare Euros languishing in my Euro account and only earning a secure 1% interest. isePankur now renamed Bondora, has been quite exciting to invest through as there have been many changes to the auto bidding system since I started there in September 2013, so just as I became used to the way my chioices were working out, it was all change so I had to start again to think of a good strategy.   They have been expanding rapidly and now issue personal loans in 4 European markets.   The defaut rates for their Spanish and Slovakian loans have been very high, so I have been avoiding those areas since that became apparent, which means time consuming manual investment because the auto bid system no longer allows choice of country.   I do not sell overdue loans on the secondary market, so my returns on the platform will be completely dependent on the eventual recovery of the defaulted loans, which will only become apparent after a few years.   The interest rates are high so I have accepted the level of risk involved. Continue reading

P2P Lending in Slovakia

This is a guest post by Roman Feranec, CEO of Žltý melón (full bio at the end of the article)

Slovakia is an Eastern European country with 5.5 million inhabitants. The country borders with Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary and Ukraine. Regarding its real GDP per capita exceeding 10 thousand EUR, it is one of the most developed countries in eastern European region. Slovakia is a NATO and EU member and in 2009 the country joined Eurozone and started using EURO as its currency.

Peer to peer lending, also known as Marketplace lending, started in Slovakia at the end of 2012. In just two years of operation it proved that it could be an interesting financial alternative with valuable benefits for people in need of money, as well as for people looking for a stable and good appreciation of their savings. This all despite the fact that Slovaks are generally more conservative than their peers in western countries and banks in Slovakia were almost no hit by the recent financial crises.

Slovakia FlagThe Slovak market of unsecured consumer lending reaches a volume of approximately 150 million EUR in new loans every month. There is a big competition between 12 retail banks keeping the average interest rate at about 14 % p.a. P2P loans at the moment represent just a tiny fraction of the market with 0.1 % market share. This can also show a huge growth potential for this alternative.

The first and so far the only domestic P2P loans provider is called Žltý melón. The company was set up by a team of people with long-term experience in banking and financial industry. Žltý melón was launched at the end of 2012 and since then it has provided about 2 million EUR of loans with current volumes of 160 – 200 thousand EUR of new loans per month. It provides ordinary unsecured retail consumer loans – purpose or non-purpose. Recently it has also introduced loans for financing real estates with a guarantee for investors covered by real estate and also company guarantee of major development company. The new product is one of the outcomes of a bigger partnership between Žltý melón and local leading residential developer Cresco Group. Continue reading

P2P Lending – a View from Australia

This is a guest post by Leo Tyndall, CEO and founder of Marketlend.

The peer-to-peer lending industry remains embryonic in that there are only two Australian peer-to-peer lenders, Society One and Marketlend. The remaining peer-to-peer lenders RateSetter and ThinCats are spin-offs of their UK operations -RateSetter Australia is by now only partly owned by Retail Money Market.

australia-flagThe focuses of both Society One and RateSetter are personal loans whereas ThinCats and Marketlend focus on commercial lending. Legal structure by Society One and RateSetter is a managed investment scheme. ThinCats legal structure is unclear aside from that they are an authorised representative of an Australian Financial Services License similar to Society One and Marketlend. However, Marketlend has opted for the more traditional debt structure by establishing trusts that issue tradable bonds by an independent trustee.

The Australian peer to peer market is operating in the commercial banking market which is 2123 billion of client loans according to BMI Research as of November 2013. P2P Lending remains a new concept and irregularly reported albeit growing exposure is occurring through crowd funding publicity and statements by new investors like Murdoch investor group and James Packer investor group.

Crowdfunding saw commentary from the regulatory authorities in the form of a guidance and reference in a financial system review in last quarter of 2014. The essence is that it should be encouraged however, there are significant legislative hurdles at this time and consideration should be given to making it easier to commence such endeavors.

At this time if you offer a financial product, service, loan or investment to a retail person, a credit license is needed for lending and you are required to hold an AFSL or be an authorised representative of an AFSL holder who has sufficient licenses to enable it to advise, and offer financial products to the retail market. Furthermore, if you chose to offer a product, through a managed investment scheme, you need a responsible entity or must be a responsible entity (RE) to offer the securities. In layman terms, the RE is a similar entity to a trustee. A notable exception to this includes, operating to offer to wholesale investors and offering only business loans. Each of these has it’s own idiosyncrasies.

As recent as 15 March 2015  CBA top executive Kelly Bayer Rosmarin questioned whether peer to peer lending is driven by supply side factors in a low interest rate environment and wondered if the peer to peer model can sustain an entire cycle. This shows a lack of concern or possible complacency by the mayor banks. However other smaller or progressive banks have looked to discuss with peer to peer lenders about possible cooperation or investment.

Marketlend CEO Leo TyndallFor peer to peer lenders we welcome the benign attitude of the larger banks as it is the type of attitude that drives investors and borrowers towards this market. Australia is marketplace where the internet is a well-accepted forum for doing business and the financial services industry is already using it to develop their own businesses. This type of lending is a graduation of the electronic age of the financial services industry in Australia and here to stay.

There is talk of at least 3 new arrivals this year: Money place, Lend2fund and another that has operations offshore.

Marketlend is a business peer-to-peer lender who offers loans only to business in the form of working capital, traditional business lending and commercial property. Using intuitive software to take applications and automated proprietary software within a matter of minutes, Marketlend can complete external credit checks and rate the likelihood of loan repayment. The software is provided by third parties who offer similar solutions to government departments and public companies. A financial analysis is performed on available financials to determine debt coverage service ratios, leverage ratios and general health of the borrower. These data points, historical payment history and approximately 65 input items are used to determine the rating of the risk.  Continue reading